<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awesome Compilation Of Fails, Ownages And Hurt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cavemancircus.com/2009/09/13/awesome-compilation-of-fails-ownage-and-explosions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cavemancircus.com/2009/09/13/awesome-compilation-of-fails-ownage-and-explosions/</link>
	<description>Tapping Into Your Primoridal Instincts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Macbean</title>
		<link>http://cavemancircus.com/2009/09/13/awesome-compilation-of-fails-ownage-and-explosions/comment-page-1/#comment-213794</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Macbean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 01:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemancircus.com/?p=991#comment-213794</guid>
		<description>Throughout this awesome scheme of things you get  an A just for effort. Where you misplaced everybody was first in all the particulars. You know,  people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more true at this point. Having said that, allow me tell you just what exactly did deliver the results. The authoring can be really convincing which is possibly why I am making an effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, even though I can certainly notice a leaps in reasoning you come up with, I am not necessarily sure of just how you seem to connect the ideas that make your conclusion. For right now I shall subscribe to your position however trust in the foreseeable future you link your dots much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout this awesome scheme of things you get  an A just for effort. Where you misplaced everybody was first in all the particulars. You know,  people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more true at this point. Having said that, allow me tell you just what exactly did deliver the results. The authoring can be really convincing which is possibly why I am making an effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, even though I can certainly notice a leaps in reasoning you come up with, I am not necessarily sure of just how you seem to connect the ideas that make your conclusion. For right now I shall subscribe to your position however trust in the foreseeable future you link your dots much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; [Hot Links] NS4W.ORG</title>
		<link>http://cavemancircus.com/2009/09/13/awesome-compilation-of-fails-ownage-and-explosions/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; [Hot Links] NS4W.ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cavemancircus.com/?p=991#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8211; [ Totally Crap ]  &#8226; Awesome Compilation Of Fails, Ownages And Hurt &#8211; [ Caveman Circus  ]  &#8226; Claudia Schiffer Topless in Tank Magazine &#8211; [ YesBitch  ] &#8226; Ria Antoniou [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; [ Totally Crap ]  &bull; Awesome Compilation Of Fails, Ownages And Hurt &#8211; [ Caveman Circus  ]  &bull; Claudia Schiffer Topless in Tank Magazine &#8211; [ YesBitch  ] &bull; Ria Antoniou [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

